In Classic, you could win, but the escalation was pretty extreme. Classic's tagline was "nothing lasts", so up until two crowns, I had this impression that the greed were a metaphor for the forces of entropy and decay that constantly threaten to tear down everything you've built. I guess they added it because some people weren't satisfied with the game not having an ending, but the fact that the struggle against decay never ended felt right to me. Honestly, I find it a little weird that they added skull island to New Lands at all. But the core aesthetic doesn't come through as well as it does in Classic or New Lands. It's managed to hold my attention longer than New Lands or Classic. I would consider Two Crowns to be the best, if I was forced to choose. I would estimate it has about three times as many gameplay features as New Lands. It also has three different game modes you can play under. It also features three different challenges, with more on the way. Two Crowns is a campaign where you will travel to five different persistent lands, discovering and activating upgrades to fortify and secure all five lands. When you leave a land, it's gone forever. There are six different lands, with each being larger and more difficult than the last, but the lands aren't persistent. In New Lands you travel to different lands, and discover and unlock new features. Classic has no progression beyond the land you start on. The primary difference between them is progression.
0 kommentar(er)
